Legal Opinion
Garfield Inv. Corp. v. City of Enid
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 26, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 5566PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Garfield Investment Corporation, a Delaware corporation, instituted this action against thé-defendant, City of Enid, Oklahoma (herein referred to as City), to recover $36,510.50 paid out in property assessments in connection with the construction of an outfall sewer line located in Enid¡
The City, after answering and denying liability for such sums expended by the plaintiff, passed a resolution, in a special session of the Mayor and Board of City Commissioners, agreeing to compromise the alleged claim for the sum of $16,000.
Although the plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Threadgill v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Wilson v. City of HollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Buxton Skinner Stationery v. Bd. of Com'rs of CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. MullinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Garfield Investment Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. City of Enid, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955