Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Cea

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided October 4, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Roger S. Hayes, J.

introduction

This is a motion to dismiss an information on the ground it is facially insufficient. The motion is made pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a) and 170.35 (1) (a) and alleges the information *235fails to meet the requirements of CPL 100.15 (3) and 100.40 (1) (b) that it allege "facts of an evidentiary character supporting or tending to support the charges” which facts give "reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged”.

FACTS

The defendant is charged with violating Penal Law §§ 225.15, 225.30 and 225.05, possession of gambling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DavidsonNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MeltonNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. WienclawValley Stream Justice Court · 2000
  4. People v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. HernandezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API