Legal Opinion
People v. Wienclaw
Valley Stream Justice Court
Decided February 8, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert G. Bogle, J.
The case at bar presents an issue apparently of first impression concerning the sufficiency of an accusatory instrument. Specifically, may an information be dismissed where cross-outs and corrections have occurred in a significant part of the accusatory instrument. This motion of the defendant, Theodore J. Wienclaw, is determined as hereinafter provided.
The defendant is charged with parking his motor vehicle at an expired meter, a violation of section 93-59B of the Code of the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream. The violation is alleged to have…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.