People v. Davidson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Donald J. Mark, J.
This is an application by the defendant, who after a jury trial was found not guilty of two narcotic possession charges but guilty of the violation of loitering, pursuant to CPL 330.30 (1), to vacate the guilty verdict upon the ground that the loiter*1000ing statute is unconstitutional,1 and as such would require a reversal of the conviction as a matter of law upon an appeal.
Section 240.35 (2) of the Penal Law provides as follows:
“A person is guilty of loitering when he:
“Loiters or remains in a public place for the purpose of gambling with cards, dice or other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. OnofreNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- People v. GiordanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- New York v. UplingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. DavidsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. OcasioRochester City Court · 2001