Cooper v. Cooper
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
Defendant William A. Cooper appeals from an interlocutory judgment of divorce entered in favor of plaintiff Sylvia M. Cooper.
William’s first contention is that the trial court’s finding that each of the parties was domiciled 1 in California is unsupported by evidence. In resolving this question we of course must apply the substantial evidence rule recently reiterated in Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc., 66 Cal.2d 782, 784 [56 Cal.Rptr. 141, 427 P.2d 805]. All conflicts must be resolved against William.
The record discloses that Sylvia’s complaint alleged her…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Baldwin v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Addison v. AddisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lamborn v. LambornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Macilwaine v. Macilwaine (In re Macilwaine), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Duttenhofer v. DuttenhoferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985