Legal Opinion

Laureldale Cemetery Co. v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1927No. Appeal, 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Frazer,

Defendant operates a railroad extending from Harrisburg to Reading and continuing through the latter city to Allentown and distant points. The tracks in the City of Reading are located at grade and the large volume of freight carried between Harrisburg and Allentown and points beyond these cities, causes excessive congestion and unduly delays traffic in passing through Reading, because of the necessity of such traffic to cross defendant’s main line tracks in that city by means of cross-over switches. There are also delays incident to a heavy grade immediately…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Dryden v. Pittsburg, Virginia & Charleston Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Snyder v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Bigler v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Bierly v. Philadelphia & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laureldale Cemetery Co. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Fischer v. MachtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. In Re Improvement of Co. Ditch No. 21, Redwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API