Legal Opinion

Laureldale Cemetery Co. v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1931No. Appeal, 33PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The question before us for decision is this: When 8*4 unused acres of a total cemetery plot of 117 acres are taken by a railroad company under eminent domain proceedings, what is the proper measure of damages? Appellant claims that the proper measure is the value of the land for sepulture purposes. The court below found the proper measure to be the difference in the market value of appellant’s premises before and as unaffected by the taking and the market value of appellant’s premises after and as affected by the taking. The case was tried on this theory, and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Pittsburgh & Western Railroad v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Montgomery County v. Schuylkill Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Brown v. Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  5. Appeal of GumbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sgarlat Estate v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. St. Agnes Cemetery v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Earl M. Kerstetter, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Chatfield v. Board of Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API