Legal Opinion

Bierly v. Philadelphia & Erie Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1909No. Appeal, No. 6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 6, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Clinton Co., Jan. T., 1907, No. 1, dismissing bill in equity in case of Jonathan B. Bierly et al. v. Philadelphia & Erie Railroad Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Hall, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Error assigned was in dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

It has passed beyond controversy that a railroad company in widening its line under the provisions of the Act of March 17, 1869, P. L. 12, may appropriate by condemnation proceedings ground occupied by a dwelling house standing in the way of the improvement. This much is settled in Dryden v. Ry. Company, 208 Pa. 316. It would be a strange reasoning that would restrict this legislative grant of power to cases of widening the road, when the act of assembly which allows it for that purpose, by equally express terms, gives it where the purpose is either to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dryden v. Pittsburg, Virginia & Charleston Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laureldale Cemetery Co. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Fitzsimons v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2021
  3. Westside Electric Street Ry. Co. v. West Penn Power Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API