Legal Opinion
Martin v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1991No. B058753PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Petitioners William Lawson Martin III and Annette Martin (the Martins) seek a writ of mandate directing the trial court to grant their motion for summary adjudication of issues and declare invalid Ordinance No. 1069 enacted by real parties in interest, the City of Sierra Madre (the City) and the City Council of the City of Sierra Madre (the City Council). Ordinance No. 1069 imposed a third moratorium on the issuance of building permits in a hillside section of the City following two previous ordinances which had taken effect on May 10, 1988.
Because enactment of Ordinance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Cerini v. City of CloverdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bank of the Orient v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- G. L. Mezzetta, Inc. v. City of American CanyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Cawdrey v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Rubalcava v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cal. Charter Sch. Ass'n v. City of Huntington Park, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- CR of Rialto, Inc. v. City of RialtoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.