Fred Whitaker Company v. E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Fred Whitaker Co. (Whitaker) charges that E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc. (Barwick) has infringed the ex- elusive rights Whitaker owns under claims 4 1 and 10 2 of U.S. Patent No. 3,012,303. The patent in suit is a combination process patent. It describes a process of dyeing and treating yarn for use in carpets and upholstery fabrics. The district court held that the patent is invalid and, even if valid, uninfringed. We agree that the patent is invalid, and, for this reason, hold that the district court properly'dismissed the action.
I. Description of the patent
T…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wyeth Laboratories v. ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Cathodic Protection Service v. American Smelting & Refining Company, Federated Metals Corporation and Waynes Broyles Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Steelcase, Inc. v. Delwood Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- The Robbins Company, Cross-Appellant v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.