Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Mandel

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 3, 2009No. 08-P-18PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

In 1996, the parties, Paula Mandel and Shawn Mandel, obligated themselves, in a separation agreement provision incorporated and merged into a divorce judgment, to each pay for one-half of their daughters’ “college education expenses.” The provision contained no further explanation regarding cost or choice of school, although another merged provision provided both parents with the right to participate fully in their daughters’ activities and with input into educational decisions. A *349decade later, their older daughter enrolled at a private university costing approximately $34,000 per year. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Ellis v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ScottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. Cooper v. KetoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  3. Dyke v. ScopettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Katzman v. HealyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Dyke v. ScopettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API