Schrock v. Stonycreek Coal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Eeno, J.,
In this workmen’s compensation case, the referee and the board found “that the claimant’s disabled condition, dating from December 30, 1939, was the result of a luetic dementia and that this condition was unrelated either directly or indirectly to the slight trauma which he sustained on that date”. The court below dismissed claimant’s appeal.
According to claimant’s testimony, while he was lifting a lump of coal into a mine car it broke, and when he straightened up he struck his head against the roof of the mine tunnel. He made no complaint to the fellow-employee who worked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- District of Columbia's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Zelazny v. Seneca Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hunter v. American Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- MacKanitz v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Kostello v. KostelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Carter v. VECCHIONESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Motley v. C. F. Braun Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Bogavich v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.