Legal Opinion

Kane v. Timm

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 22, 1974No. 1027-42811-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

— Plaintiff appeals from that portion, of holding that defendants were not guilty of committing waste upon real property. The plaintiff brings this action as executrix of the estate of Louise F. Timm against the defendant-lessees for waste upon real property belonging to the estate and leased to defendants from 1948 to 1972. Although plaintiff and defendant Henry Milo Timm (hereinafter referred to as defendant) are sister and brother, their relationship has deteriorated to animosity during the past few years.

Several improvements were made to the home by the defendant during the period…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Graffell v. HoneysuckleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Olson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Delano v. TennentWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ballard v. Alaska Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. BrommersWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Liberty Lake Sewer District No. 1 v. Liberty Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. James S. Black & Co. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Blecher v. Cooperstein (In Re Cooperstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API