Legal Opinion

United States v. Joan Joyce Urrutia, Cheryl Ann Maestas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1990No. 89-50024, 89-50096PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Following jury convictions for several counts of security and bank fraud, Joan Joyce Urrutia and Cheryl Ann Maestas were sentenced to twelve and ten years, respectively. Urrutia and Maestas now ap peal their convictions and several of the district court’s rulings on various motions.

I

Count 10 of the Indictment

The appellants were charged with violating the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), 1 which reads in pertinent part, “Whoever enters or attempts to enter any bank ... with intent to commit in such bank ... any felony affecting such bank ... and in violation of any statute of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Edwin E. WiegandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Joseph Charles Bonanno, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Sonnie Davis v. Kevin Davis, United States of America v. Kevin DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Michael David Booth, United States of America v. Louis Robert Bories, United States of America v. Michael David BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Jesus Eduardo Meraz-SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API