Legal Opinion
United States v. Renteria
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2009No. 07-50471PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted appellant, Manuel Tis-corena Renteria (“Renteria”), of maliciously damaging a building and real property, the Congregation Beth Am Synagogue, used in interstate and foreign commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). We reversed that conviction and remanded for a new trial because of an improper jury instruction. Renteria was retried and a jury again found him guilty. In this present appeal, he contends that (1) the jurisdictional element of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i) was not adequately alleged in the indictment; (2) a unanimity instruction was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Uco Oil Company, and Donald SimeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey and Jerry Howard, Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey Steve VincentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. TroyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola MobilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Jerome MancusoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Renato Capili Bosi, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-AppelleeSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
- United States v. NosalDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.