Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against Clark

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 2013No. A12-0326Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue presented in this case is whether respondent Jill Clark should be transferred to disability inactive status. A referee appointed by this court made findings and recommended that Clark be transferred to disability inactive status. Because Clark is unable to competently represent clients due to mental health *188issues, we transfer Clark to disability inactive status.

I

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Jill Clark. We referred the matter to a referee. Shortly before the evidentiary hearing was…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wild v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against MurrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re Conduct of GinsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against FettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API