In re Disciplinary Action Against Clark
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The issue presented in this case is whether respondent Jill Clark should be transferred to disability inactive status. A referee appointed by this court made findings and recommended that Clark be transferred to disability inactive status. Because Clark is unable to competently represent clients due to mental health *188issues, we transfer Clark to disability inactive status.
I
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Jill Clark. We referred the matter to a referee. Shortly before the evidentiary hearing was…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wild v. OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MurrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Conduct of GinsbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against FettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.