Legal Opinion
Scott v. Goldman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 24, 1996No. 18540-7-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
917 P.2d 131 (1996)
82 Wash.App. 1
Richard SCOTT, a single person, Appellant,
v.
Pearl GOLDMAN, a single person, Respondent.
No. 18540-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
March 29, 1996.
Publication Ordered May 24, 1996.
John A. Rorem, Gig Harbor, for appellant.
John A. Paglia, Tacoma, for respondent.
SEINFELD, Chief Judge.
Richard Scott appeals the vacation of a default judgment he obtained against Pearl Goldman. Goldman cross appeals, asserting that the trial court erred by dismissing Scott's claim without prejudice. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTS
On the same day that Scott filed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Bour v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Brenner v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Bienash v. MollerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rodriguez v. James-JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Powell v. Sphere Drake Insurance P.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.