Bour v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
Deep Pacific Fishing Co. seeks review of the Court of Appeals decision holding the bankruptcy petition filed by Deep Pacific's employee, Michael Johnson, does not affect the amount of the reduced default judgment enforceable against Deep Pacific as garnishee under RCW 6.27-.200. Deep Pacific contends the reduced judgment should not include Johnson's nonexempt earnings from a second fishing trip because the bankruptcy stay precluded those earnings from being "subject to the hen provided for in RCW 6.27.350" as required by RCW 6.27.200. The Court of Appeals held the automatic stay did not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. SommervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CSG Job CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- North Sea Products, Ltd. v. Clipper Seafoods Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Harmon v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.