Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands v. Thrailkill
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 23, 2014No. Civil No. 6:14-1236-TCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COFFIN, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. They seek to enjoin a federal action allowing logging activities in an area affected by fire.
Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion (# 13) for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs make numerous arguments in support of multiple claims and counts, but ultimately the arguments are not persuasive and, for the reasons stated below, the motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.
Factual Background & Legal Background
The Douglas Fire Complex and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- National Wildlife Federation, Great Bear Foundation v. Burlington Northern Railroad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cascadia Wildlands v. Jim ThrailkillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Conservation Congress v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017