Legal Opinion

Cascadia Wildlands v. Jim Thrailkill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2015No. 14-35819PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from a dispute over scientific methodology. Cascadia Wild-lands and other environmental groups (Cascadia) appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion seeking to enjoin the Douglas Fire Complex Recovery Project (Recovery Project) in the southern Oregon Klamath Mountains. Cascadia specifically challenges the biological opinion issued by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (the Service). Because Cascadia has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, we affirm the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. United States Department of the Navy James Webb, as Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. N. D. v. Chris ReykdalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Dept. of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. MulhollandDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
  4. Alliance for the Wild Rockies, et al. v. Christopher Carlton, Acting Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Northern Region, et al.District Court, D. Montana · 2026
  5. Danielle Mari Rodriguez v. Housing Alliance and Community Partnerships (formerly Pocatello Housing Authority); and Dr. Jared Mangum, in his official and individual capacityDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API