Legal Opinion

Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 28, 2005No. 04-35138, 04-35212, 04-35237, 04-35244PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

This litigation is about the Environmental Protection Agency’s registration of 54 pesticide active ingredients that the plaintiff environmental coalitions fear may harm endangered or threatened salmon and steelhead in the waters of the Pacific Northwest. The plaintiffs, Washington Toxics Coalition et al., (“WTC”), contend that EPA violated the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), by failing to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service before approving the pesticides.

EPA admittedly did not do any such consultation, and it agrees that the Endangered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Sierra Club v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Thomas v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API