Legal Opinion
Appeal of Newcomb
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 12, 1997No. 95-608PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The petitioner, Jonathan Newcomb, appeals the decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying his claim for workers’ compensation. The board found that the petitioner was not entitled to receive compensation from his former employers, respondents Pizza Hut and Highwatch Neurorehabilitation Center (Highwatch), because he had failed to establish that he was currently disabled by an injury pursuant to RSA 281-A:2, XI (Supp. 1996). We affirm.
On June 20, 1992, the petitioner, then an employee of Pizza Hut in North Conway, injured his knee after slipping on a wet floor at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Appeal of KehoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Appeal of LalimeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of GamasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Appeal of RainvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Appeal of HookerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Appeal of KruzelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Appeal of New Hampshire Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Appeal of Rockingham County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.