State v. Pearson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
{1} After sentencing Byron Pearson (Defendant) to a one-year prison term, the district court allowed him a period of three months to attend to his personal affairs prior to the commencement of the prison term. At the expiration of this three-month period, Defendant failed to surrender himself, as ordered, to the Department of Corrections (Department). This appeal-the State’s from the district court’s quashing of an indictment alleging escape-presents a straightforward question: Did Defendant’s failure to appear on a date and time certain constitute escape? For the reasons…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Shaulis-PowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. PichonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Sunland Park v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dixon v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. GuillenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.