Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2000No. 19,877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARMIJO, Judge.

{1} After sentencing Byron Pearson (Defendant) to a one-year prison term, the district court allowed him a period of three months to attend to his personal affairs prior to the commencement of the prison term. At the expiration of this three-month period, Defendant failed to surrender himself, as ordered, to the Department of Corrections (Department). This appeal-the State’s from the district court’s quashing of an indictment alleging escape-presents a straightforward question: Did Defendant’s failure to appear on a date and time certain constitute escape? For the reasons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. Shaulis-PowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. PichonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  5. State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Sunland Park v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re Jade G.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Dixon v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. GuillenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API