Legal Opinion
State v. Shaulis-Powell
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1999No. 19,215, 19,216PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Chief Judge.
{1} This opinion addresses the consolidated appeal of Defendants’ convictions. Defendant Daniel Shaulis (Daniel) appeals his conviction for trafficking marijuana by manufacture. See NMSA 1978, § 30-31-20(A)(l) (1990). Defendant Tammy Shaulis-Powell (Tammy) appeals her conviction for possession of marijuana in excess of eight ounces. See NMSA 1978, § 30-31-23(B)(3) (1990). Both appeals are based on the following issues: (1) whether the growing of marijuana can be considered trafficking by manufacture and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying Defendants’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Ronald B. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- State v. QuinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Sandra McCarthurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Public Service Co. v. Diamond D Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. ChapmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CelusniakNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.