State v. Guillen
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} Defendant appeals the trial court’s refusal to grant him presentence confinement credit for time spent under house arrest pursuant to an electronic monitoring program. The trial court ruled that it lacked the authority to grant this credit based on its understanding of the mandatory sentencing provision of the DWI statute, NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102 (1999). We hold that the conditions of Defendant’s participation in the electronic monitoring program, coupled with the fact that Defendant was subject to punishment for the crime of escape under NMSA 1978, § 30-22-8.1 (1999),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RomanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Dedo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State v. FellhauerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. PearsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DuhonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Michael Anderson v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. FrostNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. WoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. CallowayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.