Legal Opinion
Dixon v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2004No. 22,787, 22,827PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} These consolidated cases originate from administrative proceedings before the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle Division (MVD). In Robert Dixon’s case, an MVD hearing officer ruled that the hearing on a notice of revocation of Dixon’s driver’s license was timely and revoked it under the Implied Consent Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 66-8-105 to -112 (1978, as amended through 2003) (ICA). In Andrew Strickland’s case, MVD denied his application for a limited license under NMSA 1978, § 66-5-35 (2003). Both Dixon and Strickland appealed to the district…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Hyden v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Largo v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baca v. LOS LUNAS COMMUNITY PROGRAMSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Wakeland v. New Mexico Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Glynn v. NM Taxation & Revenue Dept.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Garza v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.