Legal Opinion

Lewellen v. Crane

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1888No. 13,137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case, errors are assigned here by appel*290•lant, Lewellen, the plaintiff below, which call in question (1} the overruling of his demurrer to the second paragraph of defendant's answer, and (2) the overruling of his motion for a new trial herein.

In his complaint, plaintiff sought to recover the amount claimed to be due on a certain promissory note for the sum of $250, dated October 1st, 1883, alleged to have been executed by defendants, George Crane and John W. Steele, payable- on June 25th, 1884, to the order of Candy Lewellen and James Lewellen, and by them assigned by endorsement to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GoodwineIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Trentman v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Douglass v. BlankenshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Young v. WarderIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bennett v. ShernIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Funk v. RentchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Foster v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Wells v. MullisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API