Legal Opinion

Foster v. Dailey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1892No. 415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

The appellee’s complaint was in two paragraphs, the first being upon a promissory note made by the appellant to the appellee, and the second alleging an.indebtedness arising out of a mutual mistake in the settlement of certain accounts existing between the parties.

The court sustained a demurrer to the second paragraph of appellant’s answer, and this ruling is assigned as error.

The answer was filed on the 24th of January, 1891. The first paragraph was a general denial. The second alleged that on a day stated, subsequent to the commencement of the action, the parties made “ a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McFadden v. FritzIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Mendenhall v. LenwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Vogel v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Williams v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hildebrand v. McCrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. HinerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Board of Commissioners v. CroneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Wade v. HuberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Town of Knox v. GoldingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API