Dixon v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Missouri’s Director of Revenue (“Director”) revoked the driving privileges of Donald Dixon (“Dixon”) for allegedly refusing to submit to a chemical test to ascertain the alcohol content of his blood under Missouri’s Implied Consent Law (§ 577.020). 1 Dixon petitioned the circuit court for review of Director’s decision. The case was submitted to the trial court entirely on Director’s records, and the trial court set aside the revocation and ordered Director to reinstate Dixon’s driving privileges. We reverse and remand with directions.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
We will affirm…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Brown v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guhr v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Bruce v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Findley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Richardson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jones v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.