Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1995No. 76803PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

I

Ralph L. Miller appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. Appellant claims (1) the stop of the vehicle in which he was a passenger was constitutionally impermissible; and (2) the consent of the driver of the vehicle to a search of her person and the car did not purge the taint.of the initial illegality and, therefore, evidence of the cocaine found on appellant’s person and appellant’s post-arrest statements must be suppressed.

Once again we must determine the appropriateness of police and prosecutorial behavior in light of a citizen’s right to be free from unreasonable…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. Riche v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. State v. GoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API