Legal Opinion

Berendes v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1986No. C5-85-1437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Respondent Lamont Berendes’ driver’s license was revoked by the Commissioner of Public Safety pursuant to the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court rescinded the revocation because it found that the Commissioner failed to establish a sufficient chain of custody for the blood sample. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. Respondent did not file a brief and we proceed pursuant to Rule 142.03, Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. We reverse.

FACTS

On April 6, 1985, Officer Richard Stanek arrested respondent Lamont Berendes…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Schram v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Res Investment Co. v. County of DakotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. BellikkaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API