Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court sustaining the revocation of the driving privileges of William Palbicki pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1982), the implied consent statute. On appeal, Palbicki contends that he had reasonable grounds to refuse a blood test, that a breath test should have been offered again when he refused to take the blood test, and that the State failed to show that the nurse was qualified to withdraw blood. We affirm.
ISSUES
1. Was appellant’s refusal to submit to a blood test because the nurse did not provide…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State, Department of Highways v. LausengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Sonsthagen v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Berger v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Martin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Aunan v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.