Legal Opinion
State v. Bellikka
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 20, 1992No. C5-92-646PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
John Thomas Bellikka appeals from convictions for third-degree burglary and possession of burglary tools. He argues that the initial stop of his vehicle was not supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion, and therefore evidence obtained as a result of the stop should have been suppressed. He also contends the trial court abused discretion by admitting physical evidence for which a chain of custody had not been sufficiently established. We affirm the trial court.
FACTS
The burglar alarm at Donovan’s Saddle Shop sounded at 2:39 a.m. on November 26, 1990. Austin police…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Appelgate v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MoffattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi FarahCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014