Legal Opinion
Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-AA-613PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In 1999 and 2000, petitioners The Washington Post and its third-party insurance administrator, Gallagher Bassett Services (hereafter collectively “The Post”), made what purported to be voluntary workers’ compensation payments to claimanVinter-venor Malik (hereafter “Malik”) under Virginia compensation law. Malik disagreed with the characterization (and computation) of the payments as made under Virginia law, believing that his work-related injuries were a recurrence of injuries for which The Post had previously compensated him under the District of Columbia’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. District of Columbia Office of Worker's CompensationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lee v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- National Linen Service v. McGuinnCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foggy Bottom Ass'n v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003