Legal Opinion

National Advertising Co. v. Herold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1987No. 51523PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, National Advertising Company (National), appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants, Robert Herold, J.D. Mead, Steve Pranka and Eugene Doerr d/b/a The Realty Company (Realty Co.) and City of Berkeley (Berkeley); and in favor of defendant-intervenor, Gannett Outdoor Company of Kansas City d/b/a Gannett Outdoor Company of St. Louis (Gannett), permanently enjoining National from impeding Realty Co.’s and Gan-nett’s use of certain real estate and ordering National to remove an outdoor advertising sign from the property. We affirm.

Our standard of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thacker v. Massman Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Briner Electric Co. v. Sachs Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Long v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Nakao v. NakaoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Peterson v. KennedyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Londoff v. ConradMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Misemer v. Freda's Restaurant, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Wilson v. Midstate Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API