Legal Opinion

Langley Park Apartments, SEC. H., Inc. v. Lund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1964No. [No. 284, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

This appeal presents for our determination a novel question in Maryland and one of some importance to the legal relationship between landlord and tenant. It may be stated as follows: Does a landlord have a duty to remove, or render safe, natural accumulation of ice or snow on walkways under his control provided he knew, or should have known of the existence of a dangerous condition resulting from the ice or snow. The issue was well briefed and argued by counsel for both sides.

The facts giving rise to this question are relatively simple and virtually undisputed. The appellant Langley Park…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Woods v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Purcell v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Flynn v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  5. Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Thomas v. Panco Management of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Hemmings v. Pelham Wood Ltd. Liability Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Fuller v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF PROV.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Geise v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API