Legal Opinion

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 2005No. B179921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

We are here called upon to interpret various provisions relating to Santa Monica’s Rent Control Law (RCL), specifically those relating to owner-occupancy evictions in condominium units. The RCL was adopted in 1979. It provided that landlords could evict tenants for owner-occupancy. Under this initial version of the RCL, landlords were prevented from converting their apartments into condominiums unless they obtained removal permits.

Two important changes occurred in 1984. First, in May of that year, Santa Monica voters adopted a second means by which apartments could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Diego City Firefighters v. Board of Administration of San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Ardon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API