Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Neuharth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1983No. Civ. 10372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This election contest pursuant to Ch. 16.-1-16, NDCC poses the question — do statutes relating to election qualifications require fulfillment “before taking office” or “before becoming a candidate?” The trial court concluded that because Neuharth did not meet the residence and elector requirements until some time after the general election, but before taking office, his election was void and the office was vacant. Neuharth appealed from that part of the judgment setting aside his election and Nielsen cross appealed from that part of the judgment declaring the office vacant.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bradfield v. AvertIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Enge v. CassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Petition of TeigenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Jenness v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Luger v. LugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mullin v. PendlayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. MaciasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API