Legal Opinion

Luger v. Luger

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2009No. 20080194PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Luger and Raymond Luger appeal from a district court amended judgment and from an order denying their Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s default judgment, which held that the district court had subject matter and personal jurisdiction and that its default judgment was within the prayer for relief requested in the complaint. We affirm the jurisdiction of the district court and the default of the defendants, reverse the award of money damages, and remand with directions that the default judgment be modified.

I

[¶ 2] The parties, who are enrolled members of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Estate of PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Arrow Midstream Holdings, LLC v. 3 Bears Construction, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Solid Comfort, Inc. v. Hatchett Hospitality Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Matter of M.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Warnke v. WarnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API