Legal Opinion

State v. Macias

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 27, 1989No. 2 CA-CV 89-0072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal from a quo warranto proceeding removing defendant Mary Macias as Mayor of Nogales, she contends that the trial court erred in finding that she was not a resident of the City of Nogales at the time of her election and in refusing to find that she had cured any disqualification from holding office before she was removed. We affirm.

Under Ariz. Const, art. 7 § 15, to be eligible to be elected mayor of a city one must be “a qualified elector of the ... municipality in which such person shall be elected.” By A.R.S. §§ 16-121 and 9-822, one is a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fenton v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. West, Atty. Gen. v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Demaree v. ScatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Jordan v. PearceIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Jennings v. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API