Legal Opinion

Hoose v. Doody

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2008No. 43A03-0708-CV-420PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Michael A. Hoose and Darlene S. Hoose appeal the judgment on their complaint against William H. Doody and Judith A. Doody, denying the Hooses’ request for a declaration of ownership and injunctive relief. We affirm.

Issues

The Hooses raise two issues, which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the Hooses do not *86possess record title to the subject real estate;

II. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the Hooses failed to establish their claim for adverse possession; and

III. Whether the Hooses waived their prescriptive…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. McGill v. LingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Endres v. Indiana State PoliceIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. RLI Insurance Company v. Conseco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. County of Lake and the Lake County Plan Commission v. Alan J. Pahl and Roderick PahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Roberts v. FeitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API