Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Feitz
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 2010No. 71A04-0910-CV-581PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Plaintiffs, Patrick and Christine Roberts (collectively, the Roberts), appeal the trial court's Judgment in favor of Appeliees-Defendants', Robert and Bob Feitz (collectively, the Feitzes), counterclaim, determining that the Feitzes are legal owners of the disputed access lane (Disputed Lane).
We affirm.
ISSUES
Roberts raise four issues on appeal, which we restate as the following:(1) Whether the trial court erred when it determined that the Feitzes chain of title was superior to the Roberts;(2) Whether the trial court erred when it determined…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Huntington v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Buckeye State Mutual Insurance Co. v. CarfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Altevogt v. BrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. PowelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Clifford and Judith Ann Garrett v. Paul and Linda SpearIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- David L. Jenner and Vickie Jenner v. Bloomington Cellular Services, Inc. and Crown Castle South LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Jeffrey B. Morgan and Wendi S. Morgan v. Andrew White and Holly WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.