Legal Opinion
Markard v. Markard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff *471appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated December 5, 1997, as denied that branch of his motion which was for the return of the retainer fee paid to his attorney, the nonpartyrespondent, Allan S. Botter and directed arbitration of a fee dispute.
Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof directing the parties to proceed to fee arbitration; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hom v. HomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- K. E. C. v. C. A. C.New York Supreme Court · 1997
- L.H. v. V.W.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1996
- Philips v. PhilipsNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Flanagan v. FlanaganNew York Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coccia v. LiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Mulcahy v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Edelman v. PosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bruk v. AlbínAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Eisenberger v. BliskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.