Legal Opinion

Bruk v. Albín

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a judgment declaring that a mortgage and bond held by the defendants as security for the payment of attorneys’ fees are invalid, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gewanter, J.), entered May 24, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants on their counterclaim in the principal sum of $41,855.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, by adding thereto a provision declaring that the mortgage and bond held by the defendants as security for the payment of attorneys’ fees are invalid; as so modified, the judgment is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Campagnola v. MulhollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Markard v. MarkardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur FinansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Callaghan v. CallaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Sharp v. SharpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re Estate of MorminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API