Legal Opinion

K. E. C. v. C. A. C.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*593OPINION OF THE COURT

Virginia E. Yancey, J.

By order to show cause signed on October 17, 1996,1 the law firm of R. & R. moved to withdraw as counsel to the defendant C. A. C. The law firm also moved for a retaining lien for the legal services provided to the defendant. The defendant retained new counsel who appeared before the Honorable William Rigler on November 18, 1996, the date the motion had been scheduled for argument. N. S., new counsel for the defendant, and R. & R. reached a proposed settlement that day but the defendant left the courthouse and later refused to sign the stipulation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Hom v. HomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. L.H. v. V.W.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1996
  4. McMahon v. EvansNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Oldendorf v. OldendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Markard v. MarkardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Scordio v. ScordioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Moraitis v. MoraitisNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Philips v. PhilipsNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re BrunoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API