Legal Opinion
L.H. v. V.W.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 20, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Doris Ling-Cohan, J.
This is a claim brought in the Small Claims Part for attorney’s fees allegedly owed to claimant for services rendered in connection with a divorce proceeding in which defendant was suing her husband. The defendant counterclaimed for fees paid for services allegedly not rendered in the divorce action. A trial was held at which claimant and defendant testified.
*121This attorney’s fee application is governed by the "new” matrimonial rules.1 Although these rules are referred to as "new”, these rules have been in eifect since November 30, 1993. (See, Silbermann…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Solack Estates, Inc. v. GoodmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Levins v. BucholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Levins v. BucholtzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
- Jackson v. Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Markard v. MarkardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- K. E. C. v. C. A. C.New York Supreme Court · 1997
- Larrison v. Scarola Reavis & Parent LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Landro v. D'AmondCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
- Rotker v. RotkerNew York Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.