Legal Opinion
Schulz v. Saeman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1967No. Civ. 8352PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrutz, Judge
(on reassignment).
The plaintiff brought this action to enforce an option to purchase real estate. The facts are not in dispute and are, briefly stated, as follows:
Imanuel Schulz died testate on March 20, 1956. At the time of his death, he was the owner of certain real property, including the Southwest Quarter (SW54) of Section 19; the South Half of the Southwest Quarter (S1/2SW14), the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NWi4SW]4)> and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SWJ4NWJ4) of Section 32; all in Township 146, Range 89, Mercer County, North Dakota.
By his last will…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fischer v. DolwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Joy v. EltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Graves v. First National Bank in Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Manikowske Ex Rel. Bladow v. ManikowskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Nystuen's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sturdevant v. SAE Warehouse, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Loberg v. AlfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Estate of BrudevigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Matter of George Massad TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.