Legal Opinion

Manikowske Ex Rel. Bladow v. Manikowske

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1965No. 8198PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment in an action tried to the court without a jury and the plaintiff, as appellant, has demanded trial de novo.

The plaintiff, Maurice Manikowske, through his guardian, Clarence Bladow, brought this action against his brother, Thomas E. Manikowske; his brother’s wife, Martha Manikowske, individually and as executrix of the estate of Alice Mani-kowske; the children of Thomas E. and Martha Manikowske, namely, Penny Mani-kowske, Bonny Manikowske, and Thomas W. Manikowske. These parties will be referred to by their first names. Also named defendants in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stenson v. H. S. Halvorson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Shong v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Fischer v. DolwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Joy v. EltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Sjoli v. HogensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sturdevant v. SAE Warehouse, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Spagnolia v. MonaskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McCarney v. KnudsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Loberg v. AlfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Baukol-Noonan, Inc. v. BargmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API