Legal Opinion

Pifer v. McDermott

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20130027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Barbara McDermott appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Kevin Pifer $80,957.07 in damages for unlawful interference with business, and from several other orders issued by the district court in connection with these proceedings. We conclude the court *436did not err in ruling as a matter of law that the purchase option given to Pifer by her mother, Dorothy Bevan, was a valid and enforceable gift. We also conclude the interference with business claim was properly presented to the jury, the evidence supports the jury verdict and the court did not abuse…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Vanderhoof v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Horgan v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deckert v. McCormickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Zavadil v. RudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. McDermott v. PiferSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API