Legal Opinion
Musa v. Continental Insurance Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 1994No. 92-CV-975PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
Appellant Abas Musa challenges an order by the trial court granting partial summary judgment in favor of his insurer, Continental Insurance Company, on his claim for uninsured motorist benefits. He argues that a genuine issue exists as to whether he came-within one of the three statutory exceptions, found in D.C.Code § 35 — 2105(b)(1) (1993), permitting a recipient of personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits to maintain a separate tort action. We hold that the trial court’s ruling was correct and accordingly affirm.
I
On August 1,1990, Mr. Musa was involved in an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Graff v. MalawerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Monroe v. ForemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kotsch v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Joeckel v. Disabled American VeteransDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.